Evidential vs Classical vs Presuppositional Apologetics

TL;DR Evidential Apologetics: Emphasizing Empirical Evidence Evidential Apologetics is a method that emphasizes the use of empirical evidence to support the truth claims of Christianity. This approach is particularly effective in a culture that highly values scientific and historical data. Evidential apologists often use archaeological discoveries, historical documentation, and scientific findings to substantiate biblical narratives […]

Read More

The Ultimate Proof for Christianity – Cornelius Van Til

TL;DR Presuppositional Truth of the Bible Cornelius Van Til’s apologetic approach is grounded in the belief that the Bible’s truth is presuppositional, meaning it is the fundamental basis from which all understanding and reasoning must begin. According to Van Til, the ultimate proof for Christianity is not found through independent human reasoning but by starting […]

Read More

The Ultimate Proof for Christianity – Gordon Clark

TL;DR Self-Attesting Nature of the Bible Gordon Clark’s apologetic method emphasizes the self-attesting nature of the Bible as the ultimate proof for Christianity. This approach asserts that the Bible, as God’s revelation, is the highest authority and cannot be subjected to external verification. As stated in 2 Timothy 3:16-17, “All Scripture is breathed out by […]

Read More

What is Presuppositional Apologetics?

TL;DR Cornelius Van Til’s Approach to Presuppositional Apologetics Cornelius Van Til, a central figure in the field of presuppositional apologetics, articulated a distinctive approach that centers on the idea that all human knowledge and rationality are grounded in foundational beliefs or presuppositions. These presuppositions, according to Van Til, are inherently theistic or non-theistic. He asserted […]

Read More